撰写评论

A Small Orange 对比 Psychz Networks

Comparison
比较选项 浏览 A Small Orange 浏览 Psychz Networks
定价
20项主机方案 11项主机方案
起步价 ¥19 / 月 ¥167.87 / 月
免费域名
赠券
用户评分
1.9
3.4
可靠性 1.7
3.0
定价 2.3
4.5
用户体验 1.8
3.0
技术支持 1.3
3.0
功能 2.1
3.5
用户评论
28 评论 2 评论
最新好评
Very good experience. No downtime in last 3 months.
Ridwan Choudhury,
9.6
I signed up with A Small Orange despite seeing many bitter reviews on the internet. I've been using ASO shared (small) plan for 3 months. Never experienced any issue with their service. I've monitored my website uptime with J... 展开 etpack plugin of wordpress and tested speed, server response time regularly. Never experienced any downtime in last 3 months. Pingdom shows my website is faster than the 98% website. Actually, so far I'm very happy with their service.
It is true that their support ticket is very slow and they took almost two weeks to reply my ticket about registering a new domain. But I never had to wait more than 3 minutes to get live chat support. My ticket was solved instantly via live chat.
Another good thing about ASO is their server name and user area interface is very unique and user friendly.
Hope ASO will remain consistent with their good service. Best wishes for ASO team!
收起
No reviews yet
最新差评
Truly a sub 1/5 company
Tom Herbert,
2.0
I would give them less than 1/5 if it was possible.
Avoid this host at all costs. Mind numbingly dumb people working customer service and the tech guy destroyed my company website. Right now they can't figure out how to send ... 展开 me a backup to transfer to another hosting company or they think they're playing me to get more of my money. Forget ASO. 收起
An utterly disappointing experience with DDoS mitigation.
Wyatt T,
4.0
A few months back, we started using Psychz for our DDoS protection through a GRE tunnel. Their new Chicago PoP was particularly attractive because they were offering a decent blend and good capacity from the start, and they w... 展开 ere offering us a good price.
Things started off well enough. We paid them for a few hours of their network admins' time just to make sure the setup was done properly. Unfortunately, this was only the start of a number of problems that caused massive quality of service issues for our customers as we deployed the new solution. Essentially, inbound traffic would be served to our full-time mitigated customers through a Psychz GRE tunnel from their Chicago PoP. We expected some overhead going in, and lower speeds than a cross-connect or direct peering, but what we got out of it was entirely ridiculous.
Long story short, we were only able to download ~30Mbps through the Psychz Chicago GRE tunnel. Not MB/s, but Mbps - which equates to about 3.7MB/s of actual download speeds through a GRE tunnel purportedly capable of 1Gbps. After weeks of back and forth discussions with staff at all levels of the company, including a personal Skype group with senior management, we weren't able to get anywhere. At one point, one of the managers admitted to giving us false promises on their attempted fixes - in essence, admitting to lying to us. It's also worth mentioning that the ticket staff were entirely worthless - the clearly outsourced support, assuming they ever responded at all, were perhaps the most generic and canned we've ever dealt with.
We eventually gave up and set up a GRE tunnel through USDedicated as a temporary solution. This was much better - we're able to push 600-700Mbps through their tunnel without any issues to speak of; much closer to the realistic overhead of a modern GRE tunnel. Because of this, and because of certain information we received from a third party, we can only assume that their newer PoPs are using substandard older-generation hardware to serve GRE tunnels.
I sincerely wish we had a better experience with Psychz. I think colocating or renting from them directly is probably a better overall play. But our experience using them as a third party, but closely located, mitigation provider was an - excuse the pun -unmitigated disaster.
I believe Psychz is growing and expanding far too fast for their own good. I wish they would focus more of their time and effort on making their current PoPs fantastic instead of offering service in every possible corner of the globe at rock-bottom pricing and, according to our experience, rock-bottom quality.
I want to be clear. I want companies like Pscyhz to do well. Mitigation is largely lacking, especially in locations that are relatively underserved like Chicago or Sao Paulo or Singapore, etc. I just wish they would do it a little better.
收起
共享型主机
从¥19到¥130的4项方案
低于4美元

Tiny

¥2.92 / 月
  • 空间: 512 MB
  • 带宽: 5.12 GB
  • 控制面板: cpanel
查看Tiny方案
低于8美元

Small

¥5.00 / 月
  • 空间: 5 GB
  • 带宽: 51.2 GB
  • 控制面板: cpanel
查看Small方案
超过10美元

Medium

¥10.00 / 月
  • 空间: 15 GB
  • 带宽: 153.6 GB
  • 控制面板: cpanel
查看Medium方案
VPS
从¥130到¥968的8项方案
低于4美元
低于8美元
超过10美元

1

¥20.00 / 月
  • 空间: 30 GB
  • 带宽: 无限
查看1方案
独立服务器
从¥639到¥1,775的8项方案 从¥167.87到¥1,216.40的11项方案
低于4美元
低于8美元
超过10美元

Xeon E3-1220 V2

¥99.00 / 月
  • 空间: 128 GB
  • 带宽: 无限
查看Xeon E3-1220 V2方案

Atom D525

¥695.00 / 月
  • 空间: 500 GB
  • 带宽: 无限
查看Atom D525方案
服务器位置
6中的1项 6中的1项
北美洲
欧洲
亚洲
大洋洲
南美洲
非洲及中东
技术支持
6中的5项 6中的0项
在线交流
电话支援
电邮支援
论坛支援
视频指南
知识库
支持的CMS
9中的3项 9中的0项
WordPress
托管Wordpress
Joomla
Drupal
Mageto
Fantastico
Softaculous
PrestaShop
Zen Cart
操作系统支持
2中的2项 2中的0项
Windows
Linux
支持的语言
7中的3项 7中的0项
PHP
Java
Python
Node.js
Django
Perl
Ruby on Rails
支持的数据库
3中的1项 3中的0项
MongoDB
MySQL
PostgreSQL
支持的支付方式
6中的2项 6中的0项
Paypal
信用卡
Moneybookers
电汇
Webmoney
Bitcoin
Second

第二

Winner

获胜者